Crypto Firms Launch Quantum Alliance as 6 Million Bitcoin Sit Exposed

In brief - Nine blockchain organizations launched the Quantum Alliance, an open standards body to define what “quantum-ready” means and create a common way to test and verify quantum-resistance claims across networks, wallets and infrastructure. - The group warns that... l

In brief – Nine blockchain organizations launched the Quantum Alliance, an open standards body to define what “quantum-ready” means and create a common way to test and verify quantum-resistance claims across networks, wallets and infrastructure. – The group warns that…

liptic-curve signatures leave roughly 6.04 million BTC (~30% of supply) quantum-exposed, citing forecasts pointing toward the late 2020s. – Modeled on the IETF, it will work in four groups—migration, zero-knowledge systems, wallet security and cross-chain compatibility. A group of crypto companies is trying to settle one of the industry’s murkiest questions: what it actually means for a blockchain network to be safe from quantum computers

Executives from nine organizations launched the Quantum Alliance on Thursday, an open standards body that will set criteria for judging quantum-resistance claims and create compatibility rules for networks as they migrate to new cryptography. The founding contributors span base-layer protocols, privacy networks, rollups, hardware wallets and security auditing, including Quantus, Postquant Labs, Midnight Foundation, Keystone, Abelian and security firm Hacken. Modeled on the Internet Engineering Task Force, the Alliance said proposals will advance on public evidence and working implementations rather than corporate size or token holdings, and everything it produces will be published openly.

Its work will run in four groups: blockchain migration, post-quantum zero-knowledge systems, wallet security and cross-chain compatibility. “In the future, ‘post-quantum cryptography’ will just be called ‘cryptography’ and everything else will be in a museum,” said Quantus founder and CEO Christopher Smith. The problem it’s tackling is that there’s no agreed definition of “quantum-ready,” and no standard way to test one. A network can call itself quantum-resistant today with no shared understanding of what the claim covers or what evidence should back it, a gap the Alliance was…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *