Financial Advisors Debunk the Roth vs. Traditional 401(k) Myth. Here’s the Real Rule for Your Age

Quick Read - Senator William Roth created the Roth IRA in 1997, which was four years before Bush took office, debunking a viral claim about its origins. - Choose Roth when your current tax rate is lower than your expected retirement rate; choose traditional when the reverse is...

Quick Read – Senator William Roth created the Roth IRA in 1997, which was four years before Bush took office, debunking a viral claim about its origins. – Choose Roth when your current tax rate is lower than your expected retirement rate; choose traditional when the reverse is…

ue. – SECURE 2.0 forces workers 50 and older earning over $150,000 to route catch-up contributions to Roth 401(k)s, totaling up to $35,750 for ages 60 to 63. – A viral money expert recently told his audience that traditional 401(k)s beat Roth accounts every time, claiming the Roth IRA was a George W. Bush creation designed to pull forward tax revenue during an economic downturn

His verdict: “if you do an apples-to-apples comparison of the true cost, you’re going to do better in a traditional 401(k).” If you act on that without checking the math against your own tax bracket, you could leave real money on the table for the rest of your working life. I’ve been listening to retirement planning debates for years, and this one stood out because the historical claim is wrong and the financial claim is incomplete. Brian Preston of The Money Guy Show took it apart cleanly, and his framing is what every saver should anchor to before picking a contribution box on their 401(k) portal.

The History the Viral Take Got Wrong Start with the simple fact: the Roth IRA was established by the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 and named for Senator William Roth of Delaware. That predates George W. Bush taking office in 2001.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *